The ALS Ice Bucket Challenge is a distraction, not a solution
A medical researcher friend of mine made a really good point
about the Ice Bucket Challenge yesterday, that the largest source of ALS
research funding in the world comes through the NIH, which has lost 25% of its
funding due to combination of overzealous federal budget cuts and inflation.
Why is it that our government is arguing that we can no
longer afford this, while simultaneously increasing its expenditure on sending
weapons to Israel, on drone warfare, and on building a massive surveillance
apparatus that watches the activities of pretty much everyone on the internet?
The $23 million (to date) raised through this challenge is
literally a drop in the bucket. As part of my job, I review small business
expenditures for NIH research grants to a university. The average grant that I
review is around $5-8 million dollars. That’s just for one academic study
covering about five years of research. We've got a smaller number of
subcontracting plans to review this year because the government cuts means that
grants are more competitive and many valuable research proposals are not getting
the financing that they deserve.
If you really want to
do something about ALS, maybe drop some ice buckets over the heads of members
of congress who voted to cut medical research funding?
I’ve mentioned before to friends that I don’t like the ALS
challenge because the success of internet selfie activism shows that there’s
something really narcissistic with the way that millennials are seeking to
change the world. A few days ago, I shared a very old blog post called the “Cult
of Self Sustainability”, which criticized a trend where “eco-conscious”
individuals are compelled to go green in their personal lives, while ignoring
the structural factors behind environmental crimes and climate change. In doing
so, I argued, well-meaning people are distracting themselves from working
collectively to resolve the real causes behind our ecological crisis. In the
case of environmentalism, I think that this is more deliberate. With the Ice
Bucket Challenge, I think people have become too used to the assumption that “raising
money and awareness” should be a default answer to solving society’s problems.
If as many people who have dropped ice on their heads
actually got together to demand an increase in NIH funding from Congress, it
would happen. Medical research is not a partisan issue, nor should it be. And
we also need to stop framing it as charity: until we are able to build a
framework where money is not a precursor to how we take care of one another, government
funding for credible medical research is a necessary component of a healthier
society.
Comments
Post a Comment