The ALS Ice Bucket Challenge is a distraction, not a solution

A medical researcher friend of mine made a really good point about the Ice Bucket Challenge yesterday, that the largest source of ALS research funding in the world comes through the NIH, which has lost 25% of its funding due to combination of overzealous federal budget cuts and inflation.

Why is it that our government is arguing that we can no longer afford this, while simultaneously increasing its expenditure on sending weapons to Israel, on drone warfare, and on building a massive surveillance apparatus that watches the activities of pretty much everyone on the internet?

The $23 million (to date) raised through this challenge is literally a drop in the bucket. As part of my job, I review small business expenditures for NIH research grants to a university. The average grant that I review is around $5-8 million dollars. That’s just for one academic study covering about five years of research. We've got a smaller number of subcontracting plans to review this year because the government cuts means that grants are more competitive and many valuable research proposals are not getting the financing that they deserve.

If you really want to do something about ALS, maybe drop some ice buckets over the heads of members of congress who voted to cut medical research funding?

I’ve mentioned before to friends that I don’t like the ALS challenge because the success of internet selfie activism shows that there’s something really narcissistic with the way that millennials are seeking to change the world. A few days ago, I shared a very old blog post called the “Cult of Self Sustainability”, which criticized a trend where “eco-conscious” individuals are compelled to go green in their personal lives, while ignoring the structural factors behind environmental crimes and climate change. In doing so, I argued, well-meaning people are distracting themselves from working collectively to resolve the real causes behind our ecological crisis. In the case of environmentalism, I think that this is more deliberate. With the Ice Bucket Challenge, I think people have become too used to the assumption that “raising money and awareness” should be a default answer to solving society’s problems.

If as many people who have dropped ice on their heads actually got together to demand an increase in NIH funding from Congress, it would happen. Medical research is not a partisan issue, nor should it be. And we also need to stop framing it as charity: until we are able to build a framework where money is not a precursor to how we take care of one another, government funding for credible medical research is a necessary component of a healthier society.
   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Neoliberalism or Fascism? Trump, Globalization and Global Cosmopolitanism

Image
Recently, I came across a quote from Steve Bannon, Breitbart manchild prodigy and Trump transition overseer, from a few years ago:  “Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.”  In this post, I want to share some thoughts about the unique historical relationship between neoliberalism and fascism and how this quote relates to that history. There has been a great deal of talk within the left about whether a Trump presidency will be fascist, neoliberal, or something else. The tl;dr is that I think we will see a hybrid of the two. Fascism has often been used to support the neoliberal project, and vice versa. Here are a few points and some conclusions for moving forward:  1. Neoliberalism has appeared in many forms throughout the world. The experience of it in the Global North (the US, Europe and other industrialized countries) is often different from the Global South
Read more

Scientia Potentia Est: "Anti-Science" and political discourse in the 2016 presidential election

I'm not a fan of Jill Stein. When I look at people like Caroline Lucas of the UK Green party or Maggie Chapman with Scottish Greens , I see competent leaders who can speak intelligently about public policy issues without resorting to generalized, populist language. And I don't really have a positive opinion about the viability as the Green Party as an alternative to the two-party system in the US at a national level. We're more or less beyond the tipping point for the climate at this point and hoping against all odds to vote the right person into office every four years isn't an effective strategy. Stein's wavering stance on vaccines have been a flop, for sure - a mumble jumble of OTT populist conspiracy language with an amateurish understanding of the precautionary principle and a social scientist's questioning of why/how people form dissenting opinions about science and public policy. It's not how a successful Green Party leader should talk a
Read more

On BernieBros

TW: Sexual Assault, Sexual Violence, Julian Assange/AnonUK There's often a naivety that movements for social justice are inherently full of good people. They aren't. Activist movements often reproduce the same inequalities that they purport to challenge and nowhere is that more visible right now than the rise of the Berniebro. It was inevitable that the Sanders "revolution" (while things have changed since the 80s, Bookchin's analysis of Bernie Sanders is still essential reading), in addition to mirroring some of the best aspects of radical left social movements, would also emulate their darker side. Manarchists , brocialists and brogressives existed long before Bernie announced his campaign and they will continue to exist long after. MBBs are almost always middle class, white, cishetero men who are interested in social justice and liberation, but only to the point where it does not challenge their privileged status . For pretty much every social movement
Read more